| View Poll Results: Should there be universal standards for all basic race information? | |||
| Yes: the standards should use furlongs, lengths, and seconds. | | 4 | 66.67% |
| Yes: all standards should use feet and seconds | | 1 | 16.67% |
| Yes, no matter what the standards are | | 1 | 16.67% |
| who cares | | 0 | 0% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll | |||
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Tarpon Springs, Florida
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts ![]() |
Hi there, I am in the process of developing my own analytical program, for the third time, and this time I am concerned about the accuracy of the data as reported to and collected from DRF formula files, and Equibase. My concern is that the labels for the information change from pundit to pundit, from DRF to Equibase to Brohamer, to whatever. Here is what I think would work for me, if it is available: For the majority of tracks, and for each exception, I want to know the exact distance, in feet or furlongs, from the start of each race/distance to each point of call for which a time is submitted, and the format of the time . Is the time expressed in minutes, minutes and parts of minutes, or (preferably hundreths of seconds.) I prefer not to use the term fractions, or splits, when obtaining the information because these terms seem to have multiple meanings, and working with them is driving me crazy |
| | |
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |